Archive for November, 2008
Low Voter Turnout
Wednesday, November 12th, 2008
Voter turnout exceeded 60% in the Presidential election. In local elections it seldom exceeds 25%.
The question always arises how to increase voter participation.
Student political apathy cannot be solved with one simple bill or one campaign. However, Student Senate is taking a step in the right direction by attempting to lessen the intensity of campaigning. By putting limits on campaign activities, Student Senate has created a balance between suffocating voters with too much information and allowing candidates to still get their message out.
Not only will this bill improve voter turnout by lessening campaign activity, but the new legislation will also encourage candidates to spend less time on petty advertising and more on addressing student concerns.
Because candidates now have restrictions on campaigning, they will be forced to focus more on discussing issues and answering questions than on campaign slogans.
Campus political involvement should be a priority to students during their college careers. Many reasons exist as to why students do not participate in campus politics, and it would be impossible to address all the issues at once.
However, one reason students might not vote is because they feel overwhelmed and annoyed by campaign activities, and therefore are turned off from voting.
Interesting. (We will ignore the First Amendment Rights issue.)
They are banning certain campaign activities because the students are “overwhelmed and annoyed” and thus turned off from voting.
Maybe if we didn’t allow Presidential candidates to campaign the turnout would reach 80% or higher?
Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »
One Bad Apple doesn't spoil the Whole Bunch?
Tuesday, November 11th, 2008
Meet Jersey City, NJ Councilman Steven Lipski.
Looks like a fun loving chap …Â doesn’t he?
According to the New York Daily News he is more than just a fun loving chap.
Pea-brained Jersey City Councilman Steven Lipski swore off booze Sunday – two days after he was busted for urinating on a crowd of revelers at a Washington D.C. nightclub.
“I’ve resolved not to touch alcohol again,” Lipski told reporters outside his home.
He called the incident “deeply humiliating, very embarrassing” and “troubling.”
Lipski, 44, in Washington to see a Grateful Dead tribute band, was hauled out of the concert hall by cops after staffers spotted him in the act about 9:50 p.m., club sources said.
He’s already said he’s not resigning.
I’m speechless.
Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »
Hauling Away the Garbage
Monday, November 10th, 2008
Garbage. It seems it is never ending. You take it out one day and it starts all over. There are numerous ways that the problem of garbage pickup can be accomplished. From municipal owned and run no-choice collection to hire whoever you want or haul it away yourself.
After looking at this problem over the years I have come to determine that there is no “one system fits all.”
What works for one city, fails miserable next door.
The Money Beagle from suburban Detroit writes about his recent experience with garbage pickup.
One of the things that was new to me when we bought our house last year was having to pay for garbage pickup. Prior to that, I had lived in a condo and so the garbage pickup was included in the monthly association fees.
When we were buying our house, I investigated and found that garbage pickup in our city was up to each individual household. There are five trash haulers licensed in the city, and our subdivision has a recommendation of using one of the five haulers. I signed up with them.
The cost varies with fuel costs, but most recently the cost was approximately $80 for three months, or approximately $27 per month.
I was surprised that there wasn’t a single trash hauler, and did a little bit of research on the subject. I found that the residents had actually voted it down a few years back. The details in the archive news stories were a little sketchy, but I think that the residents were nervous about it being an additional tax, some didn’t like the government ‘taking it over’, and yet other residents didn’t want to pay because they don’t use the service all year. A lot of retired people in Michigan are ’snowbirds’ and spend the winters in warmer climates such as Florida or Arizona. Many of these people felt it would be cheaper for them to pay as you go.
Recently, I heard that the city council has been inundated with requests from residents to consider this again. The costs have gone up tremendously versus what it was a couple of years ago. Plus, the fact that there were multiple haulers meant multiple trucks. This added to traffic, wear and tear on the roads, and the general displeasure of having to look at garbage on the curb as well as listen to garbage trucks going by.
Apparently, the city council is bypassing the city vote. Instead of rolling it into the taxes, they’re basically still making residents pay the garbage hauler, but they’re eliminating all but one of the trash haulers licensed in the city. People that leave for the winter can turn the service off, with a nominal re-activation fee in the spring.
And, the price for three months will be $45. That’s $35 every quarter, or $140 saved per year. That’s nothing to sneeze at. Even people that leave for four or five months will save for the time that they’re using the service. Plus, we’ll have one day of trash pickup in our subdivision, less wear on the roads, and I believe they actually provide better service. They’ll take more recycling than they do now, they’ll provide residents with larger trash bins and recycle bins, and they’ve agreed to purchase all new equipment.
For us, the hauler that was chosen is the same one we’re using, so I’m hopeful that the transition will be relatively seamless when it happens.
I can’t really see a problem with this and am glad that our city government is helping our residents save money.
My city use this same type one provider service.
There is nothing but bitching about it. A government endorsed monopoly claim many.
If there is a “perfect” garbage collection system I haven’t heard about it.
Have you?
Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »
Paper or Nothing
Friday, November 7th, 2008
Palo Alto, CA is on the verge of being the next city to ban plastic bags. Giving citizens a choice of “paper or plastic” is not enough.
PaloAltoOnline.Com tells the sad story…
The city’s plan, discussed at Monday night’s City Council meeting, received tentative approval from council members, despite opposition from residents and food-industry representatives who argued that the ban on bags would hurt business and eliminate consumer choice.
The council did not vote on the plan, but several members made it clear they fully support stronger regulations against plastic bags at checkout stands.
The city’s plan also includes ultimately banning plastic bags at other local businesses and restricting usage of Styrofoam and plastic newspaper bags, though it’s not yet clear how long it will take to implement all the additional regulations.
Blah, blah, blah.
I found the comments below this article especially interesting.
One of the comments included this link to this information about “paper vs. plastic.”
Granted, this research was done by the American Chemical Council. They may have a bias.Â
Opponents to this ban have the problem that in politics, logic very seldom defeats emotion.
Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »
A confession
Thursday, November 6th, 2008
The year was 1987. A resolution was brought before the Street Committee to take over maintenance of the County Roads within the City Limits. The idea was promoted by the Street Superintendent and City Engineer with th idea that the funds received from the State to maintain those roads would be an economic benefit to the City. The resolution passed the Street Committee and City Council unanimously.
Time passed.
The economic benefits did not pan out.
Council members who were there in 1987 were no longer there in 2008.
A new City Administrator and Mayor who were not around in 1987 looked at the situation and couldn’t understand why their City paid for the maintenance of County Roads in their City and other Cities didn’t. Questions were asked … with no definitive answers. Tempers sometimes flared. Lawsuits were discussed. It got ugly.
Then it was discovered what had happened in 1987. The resolution. That is why the County no longer maintained the roads within the City.
Why do I bring up this story? I was the Mayor in 1987 that presided over that meeting where the City Council absolved the County of road maintenance duties.
I was quickly asked by some …
What did I know and when did I know it?
Why didn’t I say something about that resolution when I clearly knew the issue was being discussed?
My answer …
Hey, it was twenty one years ago. I don’t remember every decision that was made by the City Council twenty one years ago. I sure wish I did. I wish I had remembered that resolution I most certainly would have stepped up before the ugly discussion of lawsuits was bantered about. But, I didn’t remember.
The lesson to be learned?
No matter how innocuous an issue may seem ( after all the two city experts in the field were both recommending passage) if proper questioning of an issue is not fully done, it can come back to haunt you even more than twenty years later.
Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »
It can always be worse?
Wednesday, November 5th, 2008
I believe that many times the most critical of remarks made towards local elected officials, come from citizens who seldom leave their own little world and objectively look at what they have compared to others.
To those people I say … compare this to where you live.
This is what life is like in Detroit according to the Detroit Free Press…
Tens of thousands of volunteers once again helped keep Detroit from burning out of control on Angels’ Night, but some local officials say there needs to be more help to prevent arson fires year-round.
“Those are the only three days we’ll have everything under control,” Detroit Fire Capt. Steve Varnas said of Oct. 29-31. “But on the other 362 days, we don’t have (this kind of) coverage. Tell me that’s a priority.”
Last year, Detroit had 6,625 fires that were classified as suspicious, meaning investigators initially believed the blazes were set or that there was no obvious cause such as an electrical source. That is an average of about 18 suspicious fires each day, according to Detroit Fire Department figures.
Eighteen suspicious fires each and every day on average … Day after day… Year after year.
Makes you thankful for where you live, doesn’t it.
Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »
This is cute but that is all it is…
Tuesday, November 4th, 2008
I know I’m going to sound like an old crumugen, but here goes..

Four fifth-grade students from Willis Hare Elementary School got a crash course in how government works when they recently visited the mayor at the town hall in Conway. The youngsters (Sterling Vaughan, Matthew Wheeler, Jontavias Bowers and Jordan Harrell) were selected by their peers to represent their school’s town council as mayor, vice mayor, treasurer and chairman of special events.
From the police department to the clerks office to the council boardroom, the students listened as officials talked about the daily activities involved in the government process.
“If you are going to be community leaders, it is important for you to see how decisions that effect other lives are made,†said Mayor Brian Bolton as he addressed the children.
Come on Mayor. Fifth graders are not capable of seeing “how decisions that effect other lives are made.†They are actually paying attention to the city officials maybe 25% of the time they are talking … Maybe.
This whole charade of selecting elementary students “serve” as city officials makes a cute picture, but that is all it does. It does not inspire the kids. It does not educate the kids. It allows for the kids chosen to miss a day of school. That is all it does.
It does make a cute picture though.
Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »
Long Range Planning in the Dark
Monday, November 3rd, 2008
Call it what you want…Comprehensive Planning, Master Planning, Long Range Planning … every community needs to do it. I do not know one successful business that does not have some plan or idea of where they want to be years from now. Government is no different, or at least it shouldn’t be.
I came across an article at MySanAntonio.Com which encourages the residents of Alamo Heights, TX to participate in their new Master Planning process.
This week Alamo Heights began a month long series of meetings to ask residents and business owners what they want their city to be.
Opinions and stereotypes abound for the prosperous community that is losing affordable housing but gaining residents attracted by its schools and real estate values. But a city document defining its character, goals and priorities has not been written since 1965.
“If we had followed it, we would have been in really good shape,†Mayor Louis Cooper said about the old plan.
That’s right, 1965. Over forty years since this city has done any long range planning.
When one of your local governments embarks upon make sure you attend one of the meetings set up to gather input from the citizens.
It’s like voting. If you don’t vote … don’t bitch.
If you don’t attend one of these meetings …Â don’t complain when the final document doesn’t reflect your views.
Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »



